|
| |
| The
Chadash-Hill
mouthpiece is based on the idea to create a mouth piece of outstanding quality
material, such as the old Chedeville mouthpiece blank. As a matter
of fact, it has the same or a very similar chemical components to it.
The innovation in making this product is milling it rather than, as
the standard mouthpieces today are molded. The benefits of milling
something with a precision four axel CNC milling machine is precision
par excellence. |
 |
| |
|
| The baffle, chamber, bore, and outside diameter of the
mouth piece, are the major components that make or break the product,
and can not be produced precisely by the standard molding process
and is always short of being precise and exact. The thought
behind the development of this new mouthpiece was to create a new standard
of
high grade professional mouthpiece without compromising any vital
dimensions and possessing all the vital characteristic of the Chedeville
mouthpiece of the 1930's. |
 |
| |
|
| This old masterpiece design has been meticulously
copied in order that the mouthpiece looks, measures, and plays, like the
original
Chedeville looked and played. This mouthpiece maintains the
beak shape and outside taper dimension while improving the baffle and bore
with today's current precision technology. |
 |
| |
|
|
One
of the reasons why the mouthpiece was developed, was that we wanted to make sure that
clarinetist would always have the best mouthpiece as possible. So, we decided that we would
make things in the traditional way, milled not molded, and with no quirks
or weak points in the design that a mouthpiece finisher or maker would
have to work around. Also we procured the very best
dense rubber material, and took dimensions for several Chedeville
mouthpieces that had quick response, beautiful sound, outstanding
projection, and played with excellent scale. Being that we were
doing this in a traditional way, we created mouthpiece blanks by milling, however, it
in this instance the milling machine is all computer
driven. So the mistakes that a the consistency and quality is much
better |
. |
|
